Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Brijesh Kumar Verma Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brijesh Kumar Verma Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee’s appeals for AY 2016-17 & 2017-18 and deleted additions made u/s 69A based on entries found in the “Hazir Johri” software seized during search on Jindal Bullion Ltd (JBL) Group. The AO had treated peak credit of ₹70.27 lakh and estimated profit @2% as undisclosed transactions solely relying on digital ledger entries and statements of third-party employees. The Tribunal observed that the seized data belonged to JBL and not to the assessee; therefore presumption u/s 292C could not be applied against the ass...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition as CHA Customs Duty Collections Are Fiduciary Receipts Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition for Recorded Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition as Marriage Gifts and Past Savings Explain Cash Deposits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031