Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arpita Jena Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arpita Jena Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack) Reassessment u/s 148 Quashed Where No Addition Made on Recorded Reasons; Entire Proceedings Held Invalid – ITAT Cuttack The ITAT Cuttack allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2016-17 & quashed the reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148, holding that the reassessment cannot survive when no addition is ultimately made on the very reasons recorded for reopening. In this case, the AO issued notice u/s 148 solely on the ground that the assessee had sold an immovable property for ₹75 lakh & had not filed return of income. However, during reassessment proc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031