Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P Cube Construction Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
P Cube Construction Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee’s appeal & deleted penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) for AY 2011-12, holding that penalty cannot survive where addition is sustained purely on estimation basis. In the quantum proceedings, the AO had treated purchases as bogus & made addition of ₹83.98 lakh. The CIT(A) restricted the addition to 12.5%, sustaining only ₹10.49 lakh as estimated profit element, which was later upheld by ITAT. Based on this sustained addition, the AO levied penalty at 300% of tax sought to be evaded. The Tribuna...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930