Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandip Jhunjhunwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandip Jhunjhunwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata Deletes Penalty u/s 271AAA—No Penalty Where Search Disclosure Is Properly Explained and Tax Paid The Kolkata Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Sandip Jhunjhunwala for AY 2012-13 and deleted the penalty of ₹1.44 crore levied under section 271AAA. The Tribunal held that no penalty is leviable where the assessee satisfies all three conditions prescribed under section 271AAA(2). In the present case, during the course of search under section 132, the assessee had admitted undisclosed income of ₹14.40 crore in his statement under se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section Used to Deny Depreciation Set-Off; Section 263 Order Quashed Municipal Body’s Section 10(20) Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Wrong Claim in Return No Addition on a Different Issue if Reopened Issue Fails: ITAT Deletes ₹5.75 Crore Disallowance Retracted Statement Alone Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition: ITAT Deletes Accommodation Loan Additions Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked as AO Made No Addition After Enquiry: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930