Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arvind Khetaram Purohit Vs DCIT Central Circle (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arvind Khetaram Purohit Vs DCIT Central Circle (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes On-Money Additions u/s 69/69B Based on Third-Party Excel Sheets; Denial of Cross-Examination Held Fatal The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 and deleted the additions towards alleged cash “on-money” payments for purchase of a commercial shop, which were made solely on the basis of third-party digital material (Excel sheet) seized during a search on the Rubberwala Group and the statement of a key employee (Shri Imran Ansari). The Tribunal held that the entire...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Addition for ‘Bogus Purchases’ When Exports, Stock Records and Quantitative Tally Match Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930