Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nishan Inbuild Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nishan Inbuild Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) Section 263 Revision Quashed – Protective Assessment Valid When Substantive Addition Already Made in Key Person’s Case The Delhi ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed the revision order passed by the PCIT under Section 263, holding that the original assessment could not be treated as erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The Tribunal noted that in search proceedings under Section 153C, the Assessing Officer had made additions of unexplained cash credits and commission income in the assessee’s hands only on a protecti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930