This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Property Purchase Addition Remanded Due to Unverified Agreement Date
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pratish Shah(HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Surat
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Pratish Shah(HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Stamp Duty Value as on Date of Agreement to Be Considered — ITAT Surat Remands Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition
The Surat Bench of the ITAT set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A) for AY 2018-19 and remanded the matter for fresh verification, holding that where the date of agreement and date of registration differ, the stamp duty value as on the date of agreement must be considered for the purposes of section 56(2)(vii)(b), subject to factual verification.
Key observations of the Tribunal:
Statutory proviso overlooked: The proviso to section 56(2)(vii)(...





