Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Property Purchase Addition Remanded Due to Unverified Agreement Date

Case Law Details

Case Name
Pratish Shah(HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement
Pratish Shah(HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) Stamp Duty Value as on Date of Agreement to Be Considered — ITAT Surat Remands Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition The Surat Bench of the ITAT set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A) for AY 2018-19 and remanded the matter for fresh verification, holding that where the date of agreement and date of registration differ, the stamp duty value as on the date of agreement must be considered for the purposes of section 56(2)(vii)(b), subject to factual verification. Key observations of the Tribunal: Statutory proviso overlooked: The proviso to section 56(2)(vii)(...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,493

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *