Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nagaiah Kekkireni Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nagaiah Kekkireni Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Penalty Cannot Stand When Quantum Issue Is Pending Before High Court-Once the High Court admits an appeal on the quantum issue, the matter becomes debatable The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the penalty of ₹12.12 lakh levied under section 271(1)(c), holding that penalty proceedings cannot survive when the very quantum addition is sub judice and admitted by the High Court on a substantial question of law. In this case for AY 2009-10, the penalty was levied in respect of an addition of ₹42.84 lakh made towards un...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930