Follow Us:

Section 89 Non-Disclosure Insufficient to Prove Oppression or Mismanagement: NCLAT Delhi

CA Sandeep Kanoi 14 Jan 2026 1,524 Views 1 comment Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Company Law |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary

Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satyanarayan Gupta Appellant Vs Shivangan Realestate Pvt Ltd & Ors (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Satyanarayan Gupta Appellant Vs Shivangan Realestate Pvt Ltd & Ors (NCLAT Delhi)

The appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal challenged an order of the NCLT, Jaipur Bench, which had dismissed a company petition at the threshold. The appellant claimed beneficial ownership of 5,000 equity shares constituting 50% of the company’s share capital and alleged wrongful acquisition by another respondent, relying on a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 01.01.2022. The petition sought recognition of beneficial ownership and rectification of statut

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Comments are closed.

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728