Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Yerram Vijay Kumar Vs State of Telangana & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Yerram Vijay Kumar Vs State of Telangana & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) Private Complaints Barred for Companies Act Fraud—Sections 448/451 Require SFIO Route-Supreme Court: No Private Shortcut to Corporate Fraud Prosecution: Supreme Court Rings the SFIO Bell The Supreme Court (2026 INSC 42) partly allowed the appeals and quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 448 and 451 of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that such offences cannot be taken cognizance of on the basis of a private complaint. The Court held that Section 448 (false statements) is inseparably linked to Section 447 (fra...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930