Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Patil Construction And Infrastructure Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Patil Construction And Infrastructure Limited (ITAT Mumbai) 80-IA Claim Can’t Be Allowed Blindly Year After Year: ITAT Mumbai Remands Patil Construction’s Deduction Issue for Fresh Project-wise Verification The Mumbai ITAT “C” Bench, comprising Shri Sandeep Gosain (JM) & Shri Girish Agrawal (AM), allowed the Revenue’s appeals for AYs 2017-18 & 2018-19 for statistical purposes in the case of Patil Construction and Infrastructure Ltd., and restored the issue of deduction u/s 80-IA to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. The Assessee, engaged in civil construction ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930