Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Service Tax

Invocation of extended period not justified as inadmissible Cenvat Credit duly reflected in return

Case Law Details

Case Name
HCL Technologies Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Allahabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
HCL Technologies Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Allahabad) CESTAT Allahabad held that extended period of limitation is not invocable since alleged inadmissible cenvat credit was duly reflected in the return. Accordingly, demand beyond normal period of limitation set aside. Facts- Appellant is a global IT services company engaged in the development of SOFTWARE & Exporting thereof through internet from its centers at Bangalore, Chennal, Gurgaon. Hyderabad etc to various customers situated outside India. As the appellant is mainly exporting ITS/ITE Service as per E...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *