This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Invocation of extended period not justified as inadmissible Cenvat Credit duly reflected in return
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- HCL Technologies Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Allahabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Allahabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
HCL Technologies Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Allahabad)
CESTAT Allahabad held that extended period of limitation is not invocable since alleged inadmissible cenvat credit was duly reflected in the return. Accordingly, demand beyond normal period of limitation set aside.
Facts- Appellant is a global IT services company engaged in the development of SOFTWARE & Exporting thereof through internet from its centers at Bangalore, Chennal, Gurgaon. Hyderabad etc to various customers situated outside India. As the appellant is mainly exporting ITS/ITE Service as per E...





