Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Electrical Components Not Classifiable as EV Parts Due to Specific Tariff Coverage: CAAR Mumbai

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 13177
Case Name
In re Valeo India Private Limited (CAAR Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

In re Valeo India Private Limited (CAAR Mumbai)

The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR), Mumbai examined the classification of various electronic and electrical components proposed to be imported by the applicant for manufacturing a “Combo 3-in-1” unit comprising an On-Board Charger (OBC), DC/DC Converter and Power Distribution Unit (PDU), intended for use in electric vehicles. The issue before the Authority was whether the subject goods could be classified as parts of the Combo 3-in-1 unit or as parts of motor vehicles, or whether they were required to be classified independently under their respective tariff headings.

The Authority first noted that the question raised pertained to classification of goods under the Customs Act, 1962, and was squarely covered under Section 28H(2). It examined the legal framework under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, the General Rules for Interpretation (GRI), relevant Section Notes, Chapter Notes, and HSN Explanatory Notes. Applying Rule 1 of the GRI, the Authority emphasized that classification must be determined according to the terms of the headings and relevant Section or Chapter Notes.

The applicant explained the functional roles of the OBC, DC/DC converter, and PDU within electric vehicles and clarified that the imported goods were individual components used in manufacturing the combined unit. Relying on Note 2 to Section XVI of the Tariff, the Authority held that goods which are themselves classifiable under specific headings of Chapters 84 or 85 must be classified in their own headings and not as parts of machines, even if designed for use in a specific machine. Further, Note 2 to Section XVII excluded electrical machinery and equipment of Chapter 85 from being treated as motor vehicle parts under Heading 8708. The Authority also observed that the products were not exclusively usable in automobiles and were specifically covered elsewhere in the tariff.

Having concluded that the subject goods could not be classified as parts of the Combo 3-in-1 unit or as motor vehicle parts, the Authority proceeded to classify each item individually:

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 20,886

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Comments are closed.