Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amol Vasant Deshmukh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amol Vasant Deshmukh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 1918-Day Delay Condoned; Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Deleted for Inadvertent Excess under section 54F/54B Claim Pune ITAT “B” Bench condoned an extraordinary delay of 1918 days and deleted penalties levied u/s 271(1)(c) holding that mere excess claim of deduction due to inadvertent mistake does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. The assessees, co-owners of land under a development agreement, had offered LTCG spread over multiple years and claimed deductions u/s 54F & 54B. For AY 2015-16, while only ₹27.14 lakh of LTCG remained taxable, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930