Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashokbhai Anbabhai Kachadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashokbhai Anbabhai Kachadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Reopening Beyond 3 Years Fails ₹50-Lakh Test: 8% Estimation on Cash Deposits Can’t Save Time-Barred 148 Ahmedabad ITAT held that reassessment initiated beyond three years was without jurisdiction, as the escaped income did not meet the ₹50-lakh threshold prescribed u/s 149(1)(b). The Assessee, a commission agent in fruits & vegetables, had not filed return for AY 2013-14, claiming income below basic exemption. Based on information of cash deposits, AO issued notice u/s 148 on 30-07-2022 (beyond 3 years). During reassessment, AO tre...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930