Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Yatindra Satish Pairaikar (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010 & 2009
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

ACIT Vs Yatindra Satish Pairaikar (ITAT Mumbai)

Section 68 Can’t Survive on Investigation Report Alone: Cheque Loans, Confirmations & Repayments Trump “Accommodation Entry” Tag

Revenue reopened assessments alleging that Assessee was beneficiary of bogus unsecured loans from M/s Naman Exports & M/s Meridian Gems, solely based on Investigation Wing report branding them as accommodation entry providers. AO, despite issuing notices u/s 133(6) & receiving confirmations, bank statements, audited

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Income Tax Appeals Dismissed Due to NCLT Moratorium Against Personal Guarantors Unsecured Loans Through Banking Channels Accepted; Section 68 Addition of ₹2.87 Cr Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld on ₹5.79 Cr Purchases Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again u/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031