Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Yatindra Satish Pairaikar (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010 & 2009
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Yatindra Satish Pairaikar (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Can’t Survive on Investigation Report Alone: Cheque Loans, Confirmations & Repayments Trump “Accommodation Entry” Tag Revenue reopened assessments alleging that Assessee was beneficiary of bogus unsecured loans from M/s Naman Exports & M/s Meridian Gems, solely based on Investigation Wing report branding them as accommodation entry providers. AO, despite issuing notices u/s 133(6) & receiving confirmations, bank statements, audited accounts, ITRs & balance sheets of lenders, brushed aside all documentary evidence ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031