This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Invalid Sanction Kills Reopening: ITAT Says PCIT Cannot Replace JCIT Under Old Section 151(2)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Umar Daraj Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Umar Daraj Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Reassessment Quashed for Want of Proper Sanction: PCIT Approval Invalid u/s 151(2); ₹82.89 Crore Disallowance u/s 40A(3) Falls
Reassessment was initiated vide notice u/s 148 dated 30.03.2021 proposing disallowance of ₹82.89 crore u/s 40A(3) for alleged cash purchases of livestock, along with other issues. Tribunal held that since notice was issued prior to 01.04.2021 & more than four years had elapsed, sanction u/s 151(2) (old regime) was mandatorily required from the Joint Commissioner; however, approval was obtained from PCIT, rendering the notice juris...




