Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt Kiran Lata Bhadoria Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt Kiran Lata Bhadoria Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) Rural Land or Not? Rs.5.24 Cr 56(2)(vii) Addition Reopened—New Evidence Changes Landscape- ITAT Orders Fresh Probe into 8-km Distance Claim Assessee purchased agricultural land on 12-08-2014 for Rs.73,06,000, but stamp valuation was Rs.5,97,40,000. AO made two major additions: (i) Rs.42,22,250 as unexplained investment u/s 69, being stamp duty & registration expenses paid in cash; (ii) Rs.5,24,34,000 u/s 56(2)(vii) as differential between stamp value & declared purchase price. Assessee explained that cash of Rs.42,22,250 came from sale proce...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930