Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

AO Didn’t Enquire, CIT(A) Did; Ad-Hoc Additions Crumble; Proper Evidence Beats Estimate

Case Law Details

Case Name
ACIT Vs Chitavalasah Jute Mills Ltd (ITAT Agra)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Chitavalasah Jute Mills Ltd (ITAT Agra) Assessee’s return for AY 2012-13 was assessed ex-parte u/s 144 r.w.s.143(3) with large ad-hoc additions-40% disallowance of sundry creditors Rs.11,90,27,242, disallowance of interest Rs.99,69,661, depreciation Rs.67,84,622 & other expenses Rs.12,76,916. In the first round Tribunal remanded matter to CIT(A) to examine additional evidence. In the second round   Assessee furnished complete ledgers, schedules & explanations; AO, during remand, merely objected to admission of evidence without making any enquiry though notices were issued o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *