Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ganga Sagar Vs DDIT/ADIT (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ganga Sagar Vs DDIT/ADIT (ITAT Lucknow) 69A Dispute Reopened- Agriculture Claim Needs Cultivation Evidence: CIT(A) Order Partly Remanded Assessee challenged the sustenance of Rs.1,20,000/- added by AO u/s 69A towards alleged unexplained cash deposit. AO had earlier completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144C(3) making additions of Rs.5,68,000/- & Rs.1,20,000/-. CIT(A) deleted the larger addition but upheld Rs.1,20,000/- on the ground that Assessee produced only Khatauni showing ownership & did not furnish Khasra, evidence of cultivation, mandi receipts, sale confirmations or agricultura...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930