Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kirankumar Amrutlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kirankumar Amrutlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Routine Business Cash Deposits Can’t Be Taxed u/s 69A – ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes 115BBE Hit- No ITR Doesn’t Mean Unexplained Cash: Tribunal Protects Small Trader in DM Period Case Assessee, a small Kariyana Trader, deposited Rs.10,09,000 in his two bank accounts during demonetisation. AO treated the sum as unexplained money u/s 69A & taxed it u/s 115BBE, mainly because no return was filed for AY 2017-18. Assessee explained that his sales were Rs.48,31,861 with a low margin, resulting in taxable income of only Rs.2,33,612, hence no filing...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930