Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

₹115 Cr Penny stock & Bogus loan Reassessment Quashed for Time-Barred Section 148 Notice

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 12139
Case Name
Shree Vishvamurte Tradinvest Pvt. Ltd.Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement

Shree Vishvamurte Tradinvest Pvt. Ltd.Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Fatal Jurisdictional Error -Notice u/s 148 Issued After Surviving Time-   —ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Entire ₹115 Cr Reassessment

Assessee, a Pvt Ltd company dealing in shares, filed ROI declaring ₹9,00,890. AO reopened assessment alleging penny stock trading of ₹3.85 crore & completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144B making massive additions aggregating ₹115.22 crore, taxing them u/s 115BBE.

CIT(A) partly allowed Assessee’s appeal & partly confirmed additions on penny stock transactions & alleged bogus loans. Both Assessee & Revenue filed cross appeals before ITAT.

Assessee raised an additional legal ground challenging the validity of notice u/s 148 dated 30.08.2022, contending it was issued beyond limitation when examined in light of TOLA, Ashish Agarwal (SC 2022), Rajeev Bansal (SC 2024), & Gujarat High Court rulings in Dhanraj Govindram Kella (2025) & Rakesh Rameshchandra Patel (2025). As per the statutory matrix:

  • Original old-regime 148 notice (TOLA) was issued on 29.06.2021
  • Surviving time available only 2 days till 30.06.2021
  • AO supplied 148A(b) material on 30.05.2022
  • Latest permissible date for issuing new-regime 148 notice = 27.06.2022
  • AO, however, issued notice u/s 148 on 30.08.2022, i.e., after expiry of surviving time

ITAT held that in view of Supreme Court directions in Rajeev Bansal, any 148 notice issued beyond surviving period is invalid. Thus, notice dated 30.08.2022 was time-barred, causing entire reassessment to be void & without jurisdiction. Accordingly, Tribunal quashed the reassessment order &  allowed Assessee’s appeal on the jurisdictional ground alone. As the foundation (reassessment) itself was invalid, Revenue’s appeal automatically failed & was dismissed.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,603

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.