Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vipul Pravinbhai Lagadhir Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vipul Pravinbhai Lagadhir Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Demonetisation Cash Deposits Not Unexplained – ITAT Rajkot Applies 6% NP on Cash Deposits—Rejects 8% Estimation Assessee, engaged in mobile recharge distribution & small-scale mobile phone sales, faced best-judgment assessment u/s 144. AO treated cash deposits during demonetisation of ₹8,62,000 as unexplained u/s 69A r.w.s.115BBE & further applied 8% NP on remaining cash deposits of ₹1,91,01,420, computing business income of ₹15,28,114. Total assessed additions ignored the ₹3,48,915 income already declared u/s 44AD. CIT(A) ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930