Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vipul Pravinbhai Lagadhir Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vipul Pravinbhai Lagadhir Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Demonetisation Cash Deposits Not Unexplained – ITAT Rajkot Applies 6% NP on Cash Deposits—Rejects 8% Estimation Assessee, engaged in mobile recharge distribution & small-scale mobile phone sales, faced best-judgment assessment u/s 144. AO treated cash deposits during demonetisation of ₹8,62,000 as unexplained u/s 69A r.w.s.115BBE & further applied 8% NP on remaining cash deposits of ₹1,91,01,420, computing business income of ₹15,28,114. Total assessed additions ignored the ₹3,48,915 income already declared u/s 44AD. CIT(A) ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930