Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ali Unjhawala Asgar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ali Unjhawala Asgar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Insight Info Triggered Reopening, But Jurisdiction Defect Kills Entire Proceeding-JAO Has No Power Post-29.03.2022—148 Notice by JAO Invalid – ITAT Annuls 147/144B Assessment Assessee, a partner in M/s TAS Trading Corporation, was issued notice u/s 148A(b) based on Insight/NMS information relating to purchase of immovable property (1/3rd share: Rs.38,50,000/-) & cash deposits of Rs.12,73,700/- in Yes Bank. Assessee was a non-filer. On failure to reply, AO passed order u/s 148A(d) on 08.04.2022 & issued notice u/s 148. Assessment was ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031