Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Champalal Jaiswal Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjay Champalal Jaiswal Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Ex-Parte NFAC Order Set Aside: Best-Judgment Assessment u/s 144 Reopened for Fresh Hearing- Cash-Deposit Addition of ₹2.25 Cr Remanded Assessee, an individual, did not file return for AY 2015-16. Based on information of cash deposits of ₹2,25,64,860 in his account with Shri Renuka Mata Multi State Urban Co-op Credit Society during FY 2014-15, case was reopened. The assessee repeatedly failed to comply with notices u/s 142(1), & AO completed best-judgment assessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144, adding the entire cash deposit amount. Assessee appealed be...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930