Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Under-Reporting Penalty- AO Didn’t Decide Form 68 in Time: ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty

Case Law Details

Case Name
Mrinalini Jayant Puranik Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2019-20
Advertisement
Mrinalini Jayant Puranik Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Under-Reporting Penalty- AO Didn’t Decide Form 68 in Time: ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty Pine Tribunal examined penalty u/s 270A upheld by CIT(A)/NFAC. Assessee had not filed return originally, though TDS statements reflected income of Rs.2.63 crore. On reopening u/s 147, Assessee filed return declaring Rs.70,13,970/-, which AO accepted. AO nevertheless levied penalty of Rs.10,96,347/- for under-reporting, rejecting explanations & refusing immunity. Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that 90% of tax was already deducted at source (page 6) & that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,641

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *