Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sugrabahen Umer Bhorania Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sugrabahen Umer Bhorania Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Premature When Quantum Appeal Pending: Mumbai ITAT Remands Matter to AO Tribunal dealt with Assessee’s appeal against penalty of ₹45,10,345/- levied u/s 271(1)(c). Assessment was reopened u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 after Assessee did not file return or respond to notices issued pursuant to 148A(b). AO treated ₹68,16,000/- as Short Term Capital Gain by taking cost of acquisition at NIL & made a further addition of ₹68,00,000/- as income from other sources based on TDS credit mismatch. Assessee had already filed a quantum ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031