Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot Survive When Quantum Itself Is Remanded

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sachin Mahasukhlal Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement Sachin Mahasukhlal Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot Survive When Quantum Itself Is Remanded—Penalty Proceedings Restored to AO for Fresh Decision  Both appeals relate to penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) arising from the same quantum addition in AY 2015-16. In each case, the assessee had claimed deduction of ₹38,15,160 as interest expenditure, which the AO disallowed for lack of nexus with plot-rent income. The AO thereafter levied penalty of ₹32,02,179 in the case of Sachin Mahasukhlal Shah and ₹13,13,232 in the case of Rupa Sachin Shah. Before ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,900

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *