Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Technical Error in Schedule BP Cannot Justify Retaining 143(1) Adjustment 143(3) After Scrutiny

Case Law Details

Case Name
Standard Castings Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement Standard Castings Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Section 143(1) Intimation Merges into 143(3) Scrutiny—AO Must Rectify Apparent Punching Error & Cannot Retain CPC Adjustment; CIT(A)’s ‘Not Maintainable’ View Reversed  The Assessee filed return for AY 2018-19 declaring NIL income under normal provisions and ₹5.57 crore as book profit u/s 115JB. CPC processed the return u/s 143(1) and computed income at ₹7,08,56,368, because an apparent punching mistake occurred—long-term & short-term capital gains of ₹12.07 crore were wrongly entered in Schedule BP...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,900

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *