Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ram Kishan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ram Kishan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Second Reopening Collapses: ITAT Delhi Quashes 147 for Wrong AY, No Failure to Disclose & Mechanical Approval Assessee challenged the reassessment order passed u/s 147/144 for AY 2011-12. The original return had been filed on 31.03.2012, processed u/s 143(1), &  later reopened vide notice dated 28.03.2013, culminating in an assessment order u/s 147/143(3) on 26.03.2014.  Assessee had succeeded in that earlier round of litigation before CIT(A) on 20.12.2016. Thereafter, AO again reopened the case—this time issuing a notice for the wrong assessment year...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031