ROC Chennai imposed a Section 450 penalty on the auditor for failing to report related party disclosure non-compliance under Section 143(3)(e).
ROC Chennai imposed a ₹10,000 penalty on the auditor under Section 450 for failing to report related party disclosure non-compliance under Section 143(3)(e).
ROC Chhattisgarh imposed a ₹50,000 penalty under Section 159 for violation of Section 155 after the applicant was found holding two DINs.
ROC Chhattisgarh imposed penalties under Section 12(8) after official communications to the company’s registered office were returned as “Not Known.”
Delhi HC held a writ against X account suspension not maintainable, finding X Corp performs no public function and no basis existed for mandamus.
Madras HC granted case-specific relief after a POCSO case was quashed, directing blocking of the petitioner’s details from public access and search results.
ROC Ahmedabad imposed penalties under Section 450 for carrying on business beyond the MOA object clause before registration of its alteration under Section 13.
ROC Chennai imposed penalties under Section 450 for violation of Section 4(1)(c) where the company’s MOA objects did not align with its business activities.
ROC Bangalore imposed penalties under Section 134 for failure to include Board comments on the auditor’s adverse remark regarding Section 203 non-compliance.
Explains the legal significance of GST Dashboard modules, electronic ledgers, notices, returns, refunds and compliance under the CGST Act and Rules.
