CBIC issued Notification No. 15/2023 under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The notification extends the due date for filing the GSTR-3B return for the month of April 2023 and May 2023 until June 30, 2023. This extension is applicable to registered persons whose principal place of business is in the state of Manipur […]
ITAT Chennai in ACIT vs ETA Star Property Developers Limited case, ruled against disallowance under Section 14A in absence of earned exempt income
High Court held that the Order of Appellate Authority allowing refund to assessee cannot be ignored solely because Revenue decided to challenge the order allowing refund, directed the Revenue to disburse refund along with interest and clarified that Revenue is not precluded from availing any remedy and in case Revenue succeeds they would be entitled to recovery the amount disbursed.
CESTAT, Kolkata made a significant ruling regarding the amendment in Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Previous version of the rule stated ‘taken or utilized,’ but it was modified to ‘taken and utilized.’ This alteration in wording clearly indicates the legislative intent to exclude the imposition of interest when the credit has been taken but not utilized.
Explore the legal status of promoters under the Companies Act, 2013, as they play a pivotal role in the conception, incorporation, and establishment of a business. Learn about the definition of promoters, their rights, and their fiduciary position in the company. Understand the legal implications, including the right to recover initial expenses, proportionate amounts from co-promoters, and remuneration. Delve into key legal aspects to ensure transparency and ethical conduct in the promotion of businesses.
A comprehensive analysis of the landmark ITAT Delhi case, Sushila Goyal Vs ITO, highlighting the tribunal’s stance on penalty under Section 271(1)(c) when additions are made on an estimated basis.
In case of Chequer Marketing Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT, ITAT Delhi ruled on validity of electronic service of notices if assessee prefers physical notices
Gujarat High Court directed the petitioner to furnish their reply as second show cause notice already issued by the department containing the reasons for cancellation of GST registration.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that trade discount is not includible in the assessable value hence central excise duty is not payable on the same.
ITAT Delhi held that payment of self-assessment tax is an existing liability u/s 132B for adjustment of seized cash. Accordingly, interest u/s 234B of the Income Tax Act not leviable.
