NCLT Ahmedabad approves Smeet Dineshkumar Chaudhari’s resolution plan for Salebhai Internet Limited, ensuring its revival with unanimous CoC support under IBC.
Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority (CAA) in respect of SCNs issued to units of M/s Vishnu Pouch Packaging Pvt. Ltd Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued an order appointing a Central Excise officer as the Common Adjudicating Authority for the purpose of adjudicating Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued to M/s Vishnu […]
The Calcutta High Court overturned a tax assessment order following a technical issue with the Income Tax Portal that prevented a timely objection.
Dive into the case of Regent Professional Academy’s violation of Companies Act provisions. Learn about penalties imposed by MCA, analysis, and implications.
ITAT Delhi held that direction by CIT(A) to AO to take appropriate action for not deducting TDS from the perquisite in respect of interest free loans given to directors and to take appropriate action to tax the perquisites u/s. 17 of the Act is in excess of jurisdiction conferred by section 251 hence deleted.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit unsustainable as cash proceeds already reflected in Profit & Loss account, hence addition u/s 68 will amount to double taxation.
Held that in the absence of any incriminating material found or seized during the course of search and seizure proceedings, the additions made by the AO during the course of reassessment under section 153A of the Income Tax Act are without jurisdiction.
ITAT Delhi held that as Permanent Establishment (PE) exists, interest income being connected to the PE, has to be treated as business profit under Article 7 of the treaty. Accordingly, expenses incurred has to be set off against the interest income.
The ITAT Chandigarh ruled in favour of an assessee whose agricultural income was previously marked as income from undisclosed sources, setting a significant precedent.
ITAT Raipur held that A.O after rejecting the books of accounts of the assessee could not have based his assessment on the said books of accounts. Accordingly, once the books of account of an assessee are rejected, then profit has to be estimated.
