ITO Vs Shri Ramesh Kumar (HUF) (ITAT Bangalore) It should be kept in mind that the Hindu Law does not recognize a joint Hindu family or coparcenery as a juristic personality capable of holding property and as an entity separate from the members of the family. The true position in law is that all the […]
Balaji Enterprises Vs Principal Additional Director General, Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Ors. (Delhi High Court) A perusal of the SCN would reveal, that there is next to nothing stated, as to the reason why the concerned authority proposed the cancellation of registration. As a matter of fact, the concerned authority, ironically, put the […]
CIT-International Taxation Vs Travelport L.P. USA (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the Appellant-Revenue states that the ITAT has erred in holding that only 15% of the revenue is attributable to the assessee’s PE in India by mechanically applying the ratio of the judgment of DIT vs. Galileo International Inc., (2009) 180 Taxman 357 (Delhi) […]
Sree Rajendra Textiles Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) There is no dispute that after adjudication / assessment, the appellant did remit the CVD plus BCD and the same was not under protest and, as could be seen from the pleadings as well as the orders of both the lower authorities, the said adjudication / […]
Ester Industries Ltd Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) High Court is of the view that the condition precedent of an asset in the form of Rs.50 lakhs is not be attracted to the present case, as the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act had been issued on 17th March, 2022 i.e. within three years […]
It was held that once business is set up, expenditure incurred relating to such business have to be treated as revenue expenditure and allowed as deduction. As soon as an activity which is essential to carrying on the business is started the business must be said to have commenced.
Role of PCIT while according registration under section 12A is only to make himself satisfied about genuineness of activities to be carried out by assessee trust and compliance of such requirement of any other law for the time being in force by trust or institution material to achieve its object and then to accord registration.
CGST, Customs & Central Excise, Bhopal Zone reported having detected a case relating to an assesse engaged in the supply of exempted as well as taxable goods while not reversing the proportionate Input Tax Credits (ITC). It is estimated that the extent of evasion would exceed Rs. 200 Crores, Out of this an amount of Rs. 50 Crores was reversed by the assesse.
Bird Worldwide Flight Services (I.) Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) Court is of the view that the Petitioner has a right to get adequate time under Section 148A of the Act to respond to the show cause notice. It is pertinent to mention that Section 148A(b) of the Act permits the Assessing Officer […]
Understanding Notification 19/2022 issued by CBIC dated 28th September 2022. Learn about the Central Goods and Service Tax (Second Amendment) Rule 2022 and registration cancellation rules.
