A detailed analysis Is exporting goods and services upon payment of IGST a better option under GST? Explore the significance of refund in taxes paid.
Understand the taxability of virtual digital assets in India. Learn about the tax consequences on the transfer of digital assets and the definition of virtual digital assets.
Dilip Kumar Choudhary Vs Ministry of Corporate Affairs (Delhi High Court) 1. That the Petitioner is a Proprietor of a firm named Kumar Dilip & Associates (Herein after referred to as “Petitioner Firm”) registered under with ICSI (Institute of company secretaries of India). The Petitioner firm is comprises of company secretaries, others professionals engaged in […]
Understanding the applicability of E-way Bill for intra-state movement of goods. Learn about the rules and potential issues related to tax evasion and harassment.
Delhi High Court restrained Respondents from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, importing, exporting or in any manner dealing with products infringing the Subject Design under the Designs Act, 2000 for the main reason that a mere trade variant which is a combination of known designs would not be entitled to protection under the provisions of the Designs Act
Any male or female person born in a joint family under Hindu law who is within four levels in lineal descendent from the common male ancestor is considered as a coparcener and anyone who becomes part of the family other than by the virtue of birth (I.e., by marriage) is treated as a member.
Understand the complexities of GST registration for renting immovable property. Learn about the legal provisions and get clarity on the requirements.
Supreme Court held that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be transferred as per convenience of accused. However, as petitioner is a woman and a senior citizen. Therefore, she can always seek exemption from personal appearance.
Gujarat High Court held that the activity of dairy business cannot be construed as agricultural activity under Section 36 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Andhra Pradesh High Court observed that the law does not compel a man to do things which he cannot possibly perform and it was held that Rule 89 of CGST Rules, 2017, deals with a procedure for claiming refund, but requiring them to produce shipping bills, as proof of export cannot be made applicable to electricity, as it is impossible to produce shipping bill for export of electricity, since the Custom Law does not refer to electricity and shipping bill is a Customs document.
