This part 2 will deal with FOB contracts of import, in which Freight component is separate and identifiable, as it is not included in the value of goods. The Importer pays the freight to the Shipping Line either directly or through his appointed CHA (Clearing House Agent), which is subject to RCM u/s 5(3) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Prayas Automation Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) From the reply filed by the State authorities, it emerges that such ‘C’ Forms were not issued on account of anomaly in the valuations. As a State authority respondent No. 4 ought to have conveyed this reason to the petitioner who could have either […]
What if we tell you that there is a company that has given almost 100000% return on investment in its shares within a time span of just 11 years. Would you believe us? No matter how unbelievable it sounds but this is true. This incredible milestone has been achieved by Bajaj Finance Ltd who has […]
Cuddalore Municipality Vs Joint Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Madras High Court) Only Support services provided by the government or local authorities that have been excluded from the negative list entry are in the negative list. Otherwise, all service of government and local authorities are not taxable. Support services was defined in Section 65B […]
Russell Credit Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer (Madras High Court) The respondent bank entered into an agreement with Hindustan Power Plant Limited, Hosur, for importing and leasing of machinery on rental basis. The master lease agreement was entered into on April 17, 1998. There afterwards, the respondent bank ordered for machinery as per the specification […]
Union of India Vs S Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. (Tripura High Court) Whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in interpreting provisions of Rule 6(1) and 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and thereby giving benefit of exemption notifications in favour of the respondent-assessee, ignoring the contention of the […]
Based on the representation of the Mutual Fund Industry to consider a glide path for implementation of the policy and request of other stakeholders, it has been decided that the deemed residual maturity for the purpose of valuation of existing as well as new bonds issued under Basel III framework shall be as below:
AGFA Healthcare Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) On perusal of the documents, it is seen that there is no dispute that the appellant has paid excess duty of Rs.29,57,931/- after reassessment of the bills of entry by extending the benefit of Notification No. 12/2012-CE. The refund has been rejected on the ground […]
The assessee herein is one of the branches of M/ State Bank of Travancore, which has since been merged with M/s State Bank of India. It is stated that there was shortage of staff and domain expertise in taxation. On examination of reasons furnished by the assessee in a liberal manner, in our view, the reasons given by assessee for delay in filing appeal before Ld. CIT(A) shall constitute sufficient cause
Vishnu Fragrance Pvt.Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax, Central Excise and Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Rule 10 of Chewing Tobacco and Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2010, provides for abatement in case of non production of goods (in case of factory did not produce the notified goods […]
