Court is satisfied that no error was committed by the ITAT in holding that the value declared in the tax return filed by the Assessees under WTA cannot be taken to be the cost of acquisition in the hands of the Assessees.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Mumbai) has held that, Income from Capital Asset is Capital Gain and not business Income even if Assessee was regularly booking Flats and Selling the same. Any kind of Income from Capital Assets held by the Assessee whether or not connected with his business of profession earned must be treated as capital gain.
The challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated 21-12-2016 passed by the Principal Commissioner (PCIT) rejecting the Petitioners application under section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) on the ground of limitation.
Receipt of grant from US Aid through ICICI to create an institutional environment for technological innovations could not be regarded as meeting of cost of specific asset by Central Government or State Government or any authority established by any law in India or any other person, so as to cause Explanation 10 to section 43(1) get attracted to assessee’s case.
Receipts towards amenities are to be considered as part of rental income. However, the expenses incurred towards security service and pantry services are not connected to the rental income and hence, they should be deducted from the receipts from amenities.
Moreover, if the action of the AO is confirmed the assessee will be claiming additional deduction u/s 24 @ 30% in addition to the business and administrative expenses as the assessee is in the real estate business and the income of the assessee will be assessed lower than the returned income.
The first major tax reform i.e., implementation of VAT from January,2018 in UAE is going to be a game changer. To keep the members and other stakeholders abreast Indirect Taxes Committee of ICAI has launched Standardized PPT on “Vat in the UAE” for the benefit of members and other stakeholders. In this standardized PPT attempts […]
The appellant contended therein that it had issued shares on a premium which, according to them, was a part of the capital employed in their business. The appellant, therefore, contended that it was on this basis it claimed the said deduction and was, therefore, entitled to claim the same under Section 35D of the Act.
1. Changes recommended in Return Filing Dates: i. All taxpayers (except Composition supplier) would be required to file return in FORM GSTR-3B along with payment of tax by 20th of the succeeding month till March, 2018. ii. Timeline for filing the details of return in Form GSTR-1 is proposed to be as follows: a. Taxpayers […]
I would like to discuss that whether processed tea falls under the definition of ‘agricultural produce’ or not? Or whether by way of a circular, tea can be excluded from the ambit of the ‘Agricultural Produce’.
