It has been decided to relax the additional fee payable on Forms AOC-4, AOC-4 XBRL and Form MGT-7 upto 31/10/2015. Further, a company which is not required to file its financial statement in XBRL format and is required to file its CFS would be able to do so in the separate form for CFS without any additional fees upto 30/11/2015.
Mega Exemption under Service Tax and Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 – Relevance in GST Regime We are happy to inform that the Fourth Workshop under the series is being organised on the theme “Mega Exemption under Service Tax and Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 – Its relevance in GST Regime on Friday, 17 July, 2015 […]
At present, the minimum contract size in equity derivatives segment is Rs. 2 lakhs. The requirement was recently reviewed and it has been decided to increase the minimum contract size in equity derivatives segment to Rs. 5 lakhs.
In the matter of continuation of anti-dumping duty on Glass Fibre and articles thereof, falling under heading 7019 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, originating in, or exported from, People’s Republic of China, imposed vide notification of the Government of India shall remain in force up to and inclusive of the 13th day of July, 2016, unless revoked earlier”.
Section 77 to 86 read with Companies (Registration of charges) Rules, 2014 deals with provisions relating to the Charges under Companies Act, 2013. Section 77 exclusively talks about ‘creation of charge’. Sub-section (1) of Section 77 states that it shall be the duty of every company creating a charge within in India or outside India
July 13, 2015 BILL NO. 08 OF 2015 The Delhi Value Added Tax (2nd Amendment) Bill, 2015 (As passed by the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi on 30th June, 2015) BILL NO. 08 OF 2015 THE DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX (2nd AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015 A BILL to further amend the Delhi […]
In the case of M/s. Vir Rubber Products P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Hon’ble SC held that for claiming SSI exemption under Central Excise law, the value of clearances made on account of job work under the brand name of principal manufacturer should not be included
The High Court distinguished the remarks of the Supreme Court in the case of BSNL. The observation of one of the three judges bench of the Supreme Court in the case of BSNL was that in order to attract levy under transfer of right to use goods, the transfer has to be to the exclusion of the transferer and once the right to use the goods is transferred the owner again cannot transfer the right to others.
