As per the Development Agreement entered into between the parties, the assessee and his brothers have demolished the existing residential building and handed over the vacant space to an extent of 16800 sq ft. to the Developer for construction of the apartment. Since the residential building has already been demolished by the assessee and his brothers themselves, they are not entitled to claim benefit under section 54 of the Act.
In the judgement of Calcutta High Court in the case of Exide Industries Ltd. Vs Union of India [2007] 292 ITR 470 (Cal), it was held that section 43B(f) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) was arbitrary, unconscionable and de-hors the Supreme Court decision in the case of Bharat Earth Movers Vs CIT [2000] 245 ITR 428 (SC) and accordingly, the same was struck down as ultra-vires.
Assessing Officer has nowhere held in the impugned order that any concession was given by the employer to its employees and they have provided the accommodation on a concessional rates. Assessing Officer straightway applied Rule 3 without first establishing the case that the appellants have provided any concession in the shape of accommodation to its employees.
ICAI has arranged the ‘Tax Cloud software: Cloud based ITR & TDS Return Preparation for CAs’ enables Income Tax Return and TDS Return preparation, provides all types of assesses support including Individuals, HUFs, Firms and Companies, calculates Income Tax under all heads such as Salary, House Property, Capital Gain, Business and Profession, Other and Exempt Income Heads,
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondents, and on a perusal of the records available, it is noted that an appellate remedy is available to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order passed by the third respondent, on 27.3.2012, under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994.
CIT-DR has contended that compensation should be regarded as normal business receipt received in the normal course of business, we find that the same had not been received in lieu of undertaking any negative covenants not to compete with Schneider in India but on the contrary the assessee continues to carry on the same line of business.
Circular No. 164/15/2012-ST Clarification has been sought in respect of levy of service tax on certain vocational education/training/ skill development courses (VEC) offered by the Government (Central Government or State Government) or local authority themselves or by an entity independently established by the Government under the law, as a society or any other similar body.
Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Pune invites applications for empanelment of CA firms for conducting of Stock Audit of our clients/borrowers enjoying credit facilities from branches situated in our Pune, Ahmednagar, Nasik and Aurangabad Regions. The eligibility criteria are as under:-
Chief Commissioner has relied on the Government of India resolution providing for fee structure, 1997 and the Government of Orissa Industries Department Resolution dated 17.09.1998 to come to a conclusion that the fees collected towards “placement and training” is in excess of what was prescribed by the said resolutions. Petitioner’s case is that the resolution relied upon by the Chief Commissioner no more holds the field in view of the Act, 2007 and the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 01.06.2007
Attention is invited to Board Circular No. 50/2005-Cus. dated 1st December, 2005, issued on the above mentioned subject. References have been received regarding difficulties faced in respect of disposal of motor cars and negative list items.
