Follow Us:

Archive: May, 2008

Posts in May, 2008

Circular No. 869/07/2008-Central Excise, Dated: 16.5.2008

May 16, 2008 15355 Views 0 comment Print

Attention is invited to the Board’s circular No. 809/06/2005-CX dated 01.03.2005 on the above subject, and the subsequent modification carried out in the procedure relating to pre-audit of refund claims (involving amount more than Rs. 5 lakh) vide circular No. 857/15/2007-CX dated 02.11.2007. References have been received from the field formations to modify the procedure relating to post-audit on the lines of said circular dated 02.11.2007

Notification No. 69/2008-Customs Duty, dated 15-05-2008

May 15, 2008 556 Views 0 comment Print

The anti-dumping duty imposed under this notification shall be levied with effect from the 15th November, 2007, and shall be effective upto and inclusive of the 14th day of November, 2008 and shall be paid in Indian currency.

Amends Notification No. 15/2007-Customs Duty, dated 20th February, 2007

May 15, 2008 418 Views 0 comment Print

The principal notification No. 15/2007-CUSTOMS dated the 20th February, 2007, [G.S.R. 94(E), dated the 20th February, 2007], published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the 20th February, 2007.

Notification No. 11 (RE-2008)/2004-2009, Dated: 15.05.2008

May 15, 2008 427 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 (No.22 of 1992) read with Para 1.3 and Para 2.1 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2004-2009, the Central Government hereby makes, with immediate effect, the following amendments to Notification No.85 (RE 2007)/2004-09, dated the 17th March, 2008, as amended, vide Notification No.92 (RE-2007)/2004-2009.

Notification No. 10 (RE-2008)/2004-2009, Dated: 15.05.2008

May 15, 2008 346 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5 read with Section 3(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 (No.22 of 1992) and also read with Para 1.3 and Para 2.1 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2004-2009 (as amended from time to time), the Central Government hereby makes, with immediate effect, the following amendments to Notification No.15 (RE-2006)/2004-2009, dated 27.6.2006.

Notification No. 9 (RE-2008)/2004-2009, Dated: 15.05.2008

May 15, 2008 334 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5 read with Section 3(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 (No.22 of 1992) and also read with Para 1.3 and Para 2.1 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2004-2009, the Central Government hereby makes, with immediate effect, the following amendment to Notification No.38 (RE-2007)/2004-2009.

Amends Notification No. 36/2001-Customs Duty (N.T.), dated 3rd August 2001

May 15, 2008 433 Views 0 comment Print

The Principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide Notification No.36/2001 – Customs (N.T.), dated, the 3rd August, 2001 (S.O.748 (E), dated, the 3rd August, 2001) and was last amended vide Notification No. 40/2008-Customs (N.T.), dated, the 2nd May, 2008 (S.O. 1075(E) dated 2nd May, 2008).

Activity of construction of flats by a builder for their subsequent sale not chargeable to service tax under construction of complex services

May 15, 2008 2570 Views 0 comment Print

The circular, dated August 1, 2006, aforementioned, is binding on the department and this circular makes it more than abundantly clear that when a builder, promoter or developer undertakes construction activity for its own self, then, in such cases, in the absence of relationship of ‘service provider’ and ‘service recipient’, the question of providing ‘taxable service’ to any person by any other person does not arise at all.

Advocates cant audit, only CAs/cost accountants can

May 15, 2008 1340 Views 0 comment Print

The Supreme Court today said that only chartered or cost accountants will be eligible to audit and certify sales tax returns in bid to prevent evasion. The decision would affect the lawyers specialising in Sales Tax laws and former Sales Tax officers who work as sales tax practitioners.

Under Rule 22 (2) of the Anti-Dumping Rules and the proviso thereto, the initiation of a new shipper review cannot be with retrospective effect in the case of a first time exporter.

May 14, 2008 696 Views 0 comment Print

H and R Johnson (India) Limited,Versus Union of India – Under the given circumstances of the case and particularly the purport of Rule 22 (2) of the Anti-Dumping Rules and the proviso thereto, the initiation of a new shipper review cannot be with retrospective effect in the case of a first time exporter.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930