The company and its directors have been penalized for not having a registered office for over 1000 days, violating the Companies Act. This case highlights the importance of companies maintaining a registered office.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has penalized Pacelife Marketing Private Limited for failing to file its financial statements for three financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with financial filing requirements.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has imposed a penalty on Pacelife Marketing Private Limited for failing to file annual returns for three financial years. This order serves as a reminder to companies of their obligation to file annual returns and the consequences of non-compliance.
Government penalty for Somen Venture Private Limited for failing to update director addresses. Directors Kahkashan Zar & Mohammad Neyaz Ahmad fined ₹2.21 Lakhs each for violating Rule 12. Know your rights to appeal the order.
Read about the disciplinary action against Mr. Shashi Agarwal by IBBI for non-compliance in corporate insolvency cases. Learn about the violations and imposed penalty.
Explore the Tea (Marketing) Control (Amendment) Order, 2024 by the Ministry of Commerce. Understand the amendments, impact, and implications for tea manufacturers. Stay informed with the latest tea industry regulations.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not filing Annual Return for two financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with Annual Return filing requirements.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not filing financial statements for two financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with financial filing requirements.
M/s. Octacle Integration Private Limited director failed to comply with Companies Act by not obtaining DIN. Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of ₹3,65,500.
Subhangi Industries Private Limited director appointed without a DIN (Director Identification Number) faces a penalty of ₹3.41 lakh. The company failed to comply with Section 152(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
