#Section 148
Log in to FollowLatest Section 148 updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Re-assessment beyond 4 years without recording satisfaction of CIT is invalid

Reopening u/s 147 without recording specific reasons is invalid

Matter set aside to test enforceability of agreement to sell vis-à-vis fresh affidavit

Literal interpretation of language of Section 245A of Income Tax Act is justified

Reassessment proceedings u/s 147 unsustainable on account of change of opinion

In absence of Section 148 notice Section 245C(1) settlement application was invalid

Calcutta HC Sets Aside Assessment Order due to Violation of Natural Justice

Issuance of Notice & Reassessment Beyond Six Years Barred by Limitation

Power of reopening an assessment is a ‘power’ which should be exercised with adequate reason

Conundrum Surrounding Limitation Period For Issuance of Re-Assessment Notices Under The Income Tax Act, 1961

Order passed against a non-existing company is liable to be quashed

Initiation of reassessment in the name of non-existent amalgamated company is without jurisdiction

Reassessment merely based on information received from investigation wing is bad in law

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable as addition made on account of difference of opinion
Explore the latest Section 148 updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
