Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : ITAT held that a return filed under section 148 remains valid even if delayed. Failure to issue mandatory notice under section 143...
Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that satisfaction for initiating action against other persons in search cases must be recorded promptly. ...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill 2026 proposes allowing taxpayers to file an Updated Return even after receiving a reassessment notice under Secti...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that appellate order violated principles of natural justice after finding that key hearing notices were sent to a...
Income Tax : Court ruled that reassessment notices under Section 148 must be issued through the faceless mechanism under Section 151A and the 2...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : The Jharkhand High Court held that retrospective insertion of Section 147A removed the jurisdictional challenge against reassessme...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Explore the latest guidelines for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand key procedures, amendme...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Non-compliance due to overseas employment leads to ITAT remanding Rs. 1.9 crore tax matter for fresh adjudication, offering assessee a new hearing opportunity.
Pune ITAT remands Sahyogh Nagri Sahkari Patsanstha Maryadit’s appeal, ruling non-payment of advance tax alone cannot dismiss an appeal; directs re-adjudication on merits.
ITAT Hyderabad held that CIT(A) inspite of declining to condone the delay considered and decided the matter on merits means that CIT(A) has impliedly condoned the delay involved in the appeal.
The ITAT Chennai has remanded the case of Dr. Anbu Selvan vs. ITO, involving Rs. 50.5 lakh in unexplained money, back to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal cited the AO’s failure to specify transaction details, allowing for fresh consideration.
Supreme Court held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for making a fishing inquiry without any live link or fresh material is not permissible under the law. Accordingly, notice u/s. 148 quashed and set aside.
ITAT Delhi dismisses revenue appeal, upholding the quashing of reassessment proceedings against Vishal Gold & Precious Stones due to ‘borrowed satisfaction’ and lack of a ‘live link’ to the assessment year.
The charges paid by the Assessee’s customers are for availing services, which the Assessee provides by using its proprietary equipment and other assets. No part of its equipment or IPRs are alienated by the Assessee in favour of its customers for their use.
Mumbai ITAT quashes reassessment for Sonali Dharmendra Mhatre, ruling it time-barred under Section 149(1)(b) as the escaped income was below the Rs. 50 lakh threshold.
ITAT Mumbai rules presumptive taxation under Section 44AD doesn’t bar Section 68 additions for unexplained cash credits from suspicious transactions.
A reassessment order was quashed by the court due to a clear violation of natural justice principles, as the assessee’s response was ignored. The matter is remitted for fresh consideration.
