Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
IBBI suspends Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta for one year for contravening insolvency regulations. Details of complaints and findings in disciplinary order dated 18th October 2024.
Directors/ signatories cannot escape from their penal liability by citing its dissolution, only the accused company is dissolved and director/signatory cannot be permitted to go scot-free after the approval of resolution plan.
Karnataka High Court held that claims which are not a part of resolution plan stands extinguished, accordingly, no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not part of the resolution plan.
The Applicant is a Personal Guarantor to M/s Indian Clothing League Private Limited (the Corporate Debtor) for the cash credit facilities to the tune of Rs. 20 crore and Rs. 15 crore from the Punjab National Bank and Allahabad Bank, respectively.
NCLAT Delhi held that insolvency resolution process against co-borrower justified as obligation of the Co-Borrower is coextensive and coterminous with that of the Primary Borrower.
NCLT Hyderabad held that partnership firm are not included under the definition of personal guarantor covered under section 5(22) of the IBC, 2016. Accordingly, insolvency proceedings u/s. 95 of IBC against partnership firm cannot be initiated.
IBBI issued an order against Yogesh Kumar Gupta, IP, addressing contraventions during the CIRP of Kamrup Housing Projects. Key issues include removal of creditors.
Shri Shyam Industries Private Limited Vs Prosperity Steels Limited (NCLT Kolkata) In the case of Shri Shyam Industries Private Limited –vs.- Propserity Steels Ltd. [CP (IB) No. 998/KB/2018, Kol dated 18-02-2021], the Resolution Applicant sought various reliefs and concessions. In response to the same, NCLT has held as under: – With respect to waiver of […]
IBBI extends the deadline for filing liquidation process forms to 30th November 2024, addressing challenges faced by liquidators.
IBBI extends the deadline for filing voluntary liquidation forms to 30th November 2024, addressing challenges faced by liquidators.
