Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that a 21-year-old woman cannot be compelled to return home or marry against her wishes, treating residence, marria...
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 notices, holding that search-based material required proceedings under Sections 153A/153C, not Secti...
Income Tax : Karnataka HC held Section 147 reopening invalid where seized material from a third-party search required proceedings under Section...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed reassessment and penalty orders issued against a deceased person, holding proceedings concluded against a dead ...
Corporate Law : Andhra Pradesh HC held that AI-generated fake citations alone do not invalidate a judicial order if the correct legal principles a...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 reopening for AY 2013-14, holding Section 43CA was inapplicable and stamp duty valuation alone could...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Karnataka HC rules that land sale value for tax should be based on the agreement date, not registration date, under Section 50C of the Income Tax Act.
Gauhati High Court quashed a GST order issued after statutory limitation period under Section 73(10) of GST Act, deeming it without jurisdiction.
Fair reporting of court verdicts is an inseparable part of administration of justice and it ensures that judges remain within the bounds of law.
Punjab and Haryana HC ruled on the waiver of pre-deposit under Section 33(5) of HVAT Act, directing the appeals to be heard based on financial hardship. Writ petitions allowed.
Madras High Court held that addition towards difference between purchase value and guideline value without awaiting report of valuation officer, as matter was referred to valuation officer, is clearly unsustainable.
Delhi High Court held that deduction of tax by Land Acquisition Collector is duly, however, the same was not reflected in Form 26AS. Thus, petitioner cannot be penalized for mere reason that Form 26AS suffered from a discrepancy.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that claim not part of resolution plan stand extinguished on the date of approval of resolution plan and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan.
Madras High Court held that matter rightly transferred from jurisdiction of registered office to place of business as search was conducted based on place of business and incriminating material were seized based on place of business.
Calcutta High Court dismissed the review penalty as imposition of penalty for non-updation of Part-B of e-way bill rightly reduced to INR 50,000/- due to non-disclosure of cogent reasons.
Karnataka High Court held that passing of order on information procured from Stock Exchange and banks without furnishing the information to petitioner for their explanation is violative of principles of natural justice and hence set aside.
