Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Bombay HC quashed Section 148 reopening for AY 2013-14, holding Section 43CA was inapplicable and stamp duty valuation alone could...
Income Tax : Madras HC held Section 153C action must be supported by incriminating material relatable to the relevant assessment year, distingu...
Income Tax : Delhi HC upheld Section 263 revision, holding an unreasoned assessment on subsidy was erroneous, and remanded the issue for fresh ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC set aside a GST assessment passed against a deceased person, holding it non est in law, and permitted legal heirs to res...
Income Tax : Delhi HC held interest on borrowings for strategic shareholding may qualify under Section 36(1)(iii). Matter remanded to AO to ver...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Telangana High Court held that the whole auction proceedings are rightly vitiated since auction was done blatantly in violation of Rule 9(3) and Rule 9(4) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Accordingly, writ dismissed.
Karnataka High Court granted bail for offence punishable under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PML Act] taking into consideration the maximum punishment for the alleged offences and that there is no possibility of trial commencing in the near future.
The AO is a deciding authority. In the present case, it is apparent that the AO had decided that it was not a fit case for issuance of a notice under Section 148 of the Act but had, thereafter, revised the said decision apparently on the basis of an approval of the specified authority.
Madras High Court rules that issuing a single GST show cause notice for multiple financial years is impermissible, citing Sections 73 & 74 and procedural hardships for taxpayers.
Bombay High Court rules no GST law prohibition on transferring Input Tax Credit between amalgamating companies located in different states, enabling seamless credit flow.
The Gujarat High Court set aside GST demand notices and orders against a dissolved company, ruling that proceedings cannot be initiated against a non-existent entity
Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a bank attachment linked to an unappealed GST order, stating voidable orders must still be challenged.
Bombay High Court sets aside NMMC s order attaching Sargam Foods cash credit account for cess recovery, citing lack of legal basis for credit-freeze.
Karnataka High Court ruled a closed company can claim CENVAT credit refund, stating Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2002 does not prohibit it for ceased manufacturers.
The Calcutta High Court ruled that a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act holds priority over CGST dues, citing Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act and Supreme Court precedents.
