Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how IMS makes accepted invoice records the basis for ITC eligibility, strengthening compliance, fraud detecti...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how the GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B is insufficient to invoke Section 74 witho...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B does not automatically establish tax evasion or justify proceedings und...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue concerns confusion regarding the purpose and sequencing of GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B filings. The key takeaway is that GSTR-1 s...
Goods and Services Tax : ICAI clarified that ITC wrongly reversed under Table 4(B)(1) instead of Table 4(B)(2) can still be reclaimed within statutory time...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government introduced reforms such as e-invoicing and auto-population of data in GST returns. These measures improve accuracy,...
Goods and Services Tax : ICAI writes to CBIC requesting a one-week extension for the September 2025 GSTR-3B due date, citing the Diwali festival period and...
Goods and Services Tax : Important change in Table 6 of GSTR-9 for FY 24-25 - Taxpayers can now report ITC of previous financial year that was claimed in ...
Goods and Services Tax : BCAS requests extension of GSTR-3B filing and payment deadline for Sep 2025, arguing the original date of Oct 20 coincides with Di...
Goods and Services Tax : Due to severe floods in Maharashtra, MCTC has requested a three-day extension for the GSTR-3B filing deadline, citing hardships fa...
Goods and Services Tax : The assessment was based on four discrepancies: reconciliation issues between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, input tax credit (ITC) mismatch ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court ruled that ITC for FY 2018-19 cannot be denied merely because import and SEZ transactions were absent fro...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court remanded an ex parte assessment arising from a GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch after finding that the assessee ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court quashed ex-parte GST adjudication orders after the taxpayer claimed it could explain discrepancies betwee...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court rules GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B mismatch from clerical errors cannot trigger automatic tax recovery without Rule 88C pr...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC extends due date for filing March 2026 GSTR-3B to April 21, 2026, for registered persons under Section 39 of the CGST Act....
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN clarified that system-calculated interest for February 2026 was incorrectly reflected in March returns due to a technical iss...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Portal revises interest computation in GSTR-3B, factoring minimum cash ledger balance and auto-populating non-editable interes...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Network has issued an advisory introducing significant system enhancements in GSTR-3B beginning with the January 2026 tax peri...
Goods and Services Tax : The advisory clarifies that from November 2025, auto-populated values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B cannot be manually edited. Any corre...
Madras High Court held that the Appellate Authority should have gone into the reasons adduced by the writ petitioner for non-filing of GSTR-3B return. In absence of the same, the impugned order cancelling GST registration set aside and matter remanded back to Appellate Authority for examination.
Discover legal remedies for GST ITC disallowance due to mismatch between GSTR-3B & GSTR-2A. Explore grounds of appeal against demands, interest, and penalties. Learn about eligibility conditions under Section 16 of the GST Act. Get insights into relevant court cases for a better understanding.
It was the specific case of Mr. Chandubhai Bhagwandas Patel wherein even though Form GSTR-1 for the month of August 2019 was correctly filed declaring all the relevant details qua outward supplies appropriately, refund of IGST paid upon export of goods was denied to the petitioner due to mistake being committed in Form GSTR-3B for the said month.
Menace of fake billing whereby seller was showing higher sales in FORM GSTR-1 to enable a purchaser to claim ITC but report suppressed sales in FORM GSTR-3B to lower GST liability.
FORM GSTR-1 is a return form for regular taxpayers who have to file details of outward supplies (under Rule 59) on every 11th of next month for those who cross the turnover more than 1.5 crores annually. The taxpayers who are under the threshold limit to 1.5 crores will have to file quarterly return.
Mandatory furnishing of correct and proper information of ineligible / blocked Input Tax Credit and reversal thereof in return in FORM GSTR-3B – instructions
Mandatory furnishing of correct and proper information of ineligible Input Tax Credit and reversal thereof in Form GSTR-3B That CBIC circular no. 170/02/2022- GST has highlighted incorrect reporting of ineligible Input Tax Credit by Taxpayers. In this context, it has been observed that large portion of unclaimed IGST ITC has led to loss of revenue […]
Discover the legal perspective on depositing funds in the Electronic Cash Ledger before the due date of GSTR 3B filing. The article explores the recent judgment by the Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand in the case of M/s. RSB Transmissions (India) Limited vs. Union of India, addressing whether such deposits amount to the discharge of tax liability. Understand the implications, reasoning, and the court’s stance on interest levied for delayed filing of GSTR-3B in such situations. Stay informed and navigate the complexities of GST regulations.
RSB Transmissions India Limited Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court) A combined reading of Section 49(1) of CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 87 (6) and (7) of CGST Rules, 2017 both go to show that such deposit does not mean that the amount is appropriated towards the Government exchequer. On other hand other, a […]
Excise and Taxation Department, Government of Haryana had identified a list of 373 active registered taxpayers of State jurisdiction who had not filed FORM GSTR-3B up till March 2021. These taxpayers were liable to be cancelled under the provisions of Section 29 of the HGST Act, 2017.
