Goods and Services Tax : The article discusses how GST authorities are increasingly reversing ITC based on upstream NGTP allegations without proving fraud ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Goods and Services Tax : Explains how Section 16(2)(c) links ITC eligibility to supplier tax payment, causing hardship for bona fide taxpayers even when in...
Goods and Services Tax : This article explains how manipulating input tax credit in GSTR-3B without GSTR-2B support is treated as fraud under GST law. It h...
Goods and Services Tax : The article highlights how aggressive GST actions impact genuine businesses. The key takeaway is the need for balanced enforcement...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims based on fake invoices without actual supply of goods or services. The accused was arr...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities arrested the key accused for orchestrating fake ITC claims and fictitious export transactions. The case highlights str...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST Delhi South arrested a director for allegedly availing ₹6.53 crore in fraudulent ITC based on bogus invoices worth ₹36.28...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered a web of non-existent entities issuing invoices without supply, causing huge GST revenue loss. The mastermin...
Goods and Services Tax : Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to an accused linked to alleged fake GST billing and forged documents. The Cour...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court held that summons issued under Section 70 of the GST Act were valid and interference at the investigation stage wou...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue involved alleged cyber fraud where funds were credited to the petitioner’s account. The Court granted relief consideri...
Goods and Services Tax : The SC held that imposing an additional bank guarantee was excessive when a ₹1 crore bond with sureties was already furnished. I...
Goods and Services Tax : Considering the duration of custody and the likely delay in trial, the Court found continued detention unnecessary. It granted bai...
Goods and Services Tax : A Delhi GST alert circular reveals a Rs.6 crore Input Tax Credit fraud by a non-existent entity, detailing the scheme and mandated...
CA, CS, CMA : Delhi GST Dept exposes ₹30 Cr fake ITC via non-existent firms. Circular mandates recovery, ITC reversal & cross-jurisdiction enf...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC issues guidelines for a second All-India drive to detect and eliminate fake GST registrations, safeguarding government revenu...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance, Government of India, recently released Instruction No. 03/2023-GST, dated 14th June, 2023, outlining stri...
Goods and Services Tax : Government of India has noticed instances of fake GST registrations and issuance of bogus invoices leading to revenue loss. A meet...
CGST Thane Commissionerate busts fake Input tax credit racket worth Rs. 8 Crore Thane Central GST Commissionerate has busted a fake GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) racket and arrested the proprietor of a Dahisar based firm. Acting on a specific input from Central Intelligence Unit of CGST Mumbai zone, the anti-evasion wing of CGST Thane Commissionerate […]
Delhi HC reviews GST Act conditions for bail in Amit Gupta vs. Directorate case. Focus on ITC availing, reversal, and compliance with bail terms.
Press Release M/s Hira Steel, Nashik is engaged in the business of trading of steel and scraps. The officers of the Nasik Preventive (Hqrs.), an anti evasion wing of Central Goods and Services Tax, Nashik has inspected/visited the premises of M/s Hira Steel, PAP-54, Near Siemens, MIDC, Ambad, Nashik as per the provision laid down in […]
Enforcement Authorities South Zone, CTD have raided the residential and business premises of a GST Auditor at Bangalore and Davanagere based on field intelligence, data analytics and Police FIR and busted a fake ITC case. The Auditor has collected money in the name of tax from more than 12 registered tax payers and the same […]
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) High Court is of the view that it is highly unlikely that the petitioner i.e. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) would be engaged in input tax credit fraud as alleged by the Respondents. Accordingly, till further orders, no action shall be taken in pursuance to the impugned […]
Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Commissionerate, Mumbai West Zone has busted a fake GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) racket and arrested the proprietor of a Malad based firm. The firm was involved in fraudulent availment and passing of Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs 15.23 Crore without receiving or supply of goods, in violation of the provisions of CGST Act, 2017.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the appellants created several fictitious and physically non-existent trading company firms in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal and Maharashtra, got them registered in GSTN portal online using identity credential of several persons using forged PAN and issued fake bills to transmit fake Income Tax Credit (ITC) to several other traders.
Vimal Yashwantgiri Goswami Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The details of the tax evasion of the respective accused arraigned in the complaint, reveal that the total tax evasion of the applicant’s Company Heugo Metal is shown as Rs.4,51,05,130/- which is less than 5 crores. It is further revealed that the tax liability of […]
CGST Commissionerate Mumbai South Arrests Co-conspirator in a Fake Input Tax Credit Claim of Rs. 11.07 Cr; Proprietor arrested earlier CGST Mumbai South Commissionerate has detected tax evasion of Rs. 876 Crores, recovered Rs. 14.4 Crores so far Anti-Evasion Unit of Mumbai South CGST Commissionerate has arrested the co-conspirator in a case of M/s New […]
The allegation against applicant is that he and a co-accused have set up a number of fictitious companies, which are being used for the purposes of defrauding the government. It is contented that the accused persons have opened banks accounts in fictitious names and provided their telephone numbers and email addresses in this respect.
