Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Learn about the penalty imposed by MCA under Section 90 of Companies Act 2013. Detailed analysis, penalties on company & individuals, and appeal process included.
Read about Aura Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.’s appeal against penalties under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the reduced penalties decision.
MCA imposed a ₹15 lakh penalty on Credii Technologies Private Limited for non-compliance with Section 89 of Companies Act, 2013. Company failed to file Form MGT-6 within prescribed timeframe, contravening Section 89(6).
Learn about MCAs penalty on Longcheng Composites Pvt Ltd for breaching Section 101(1) of the Companies Act. Detailed analysis, implications, and adjudication process discussed.
Explore the implications of violating Section 64(1)(a) of the Companies Act as MCA levies a penalty on Longcheng Composites Private Limited and its officers.
Read about the adjudication order penalizing Longcheng Composites Pvt. Ltd. for violating Section 62(1)(a) of the Companies Act. Detailed analysis and implications.
Longcheng Composites Private Limited faces penalties from MCA under Section 12(3)(c) of the Companies Act for incorrect registered office address on PAS-3, Financial Statements & SH-7.
Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, imposes penalties on Credii Technologies Pvt. Ltd. for failing to comply with Section 89 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Learn about the Rs. 3.84 lakh penalty imposed by MCA on Shanti Easy Pay Nidhi Ltd. for failing to maintain a registered office. Read the full details here.
MCA imposes Rs. 8 lakh penalty on Velotio Technologies for non-disclosure of related party transactions under Section 134(3)(h). Detailed adjudication order.
