Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
Mars Mercantiles Pvt Ltd’s penalty for violating Section 158 of the Companies Act was reduced by the Regional Director (ER) to ₹1.5 Lakhs on appeal.
The Regional Director, Eastern Region, reduces the penalty imposed on Mayflower Infra Realty Pvt. Ltd. and its Director for violating Section 161 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Company earned over 10% of turnover from a related party but failed to get shareholder approval, violating section 188. MCA imposes a penalty.
Tablespace Technologies fined ₹1,00,000 for failing to disclose director’s interests as required by Section 184 of the Companies Act.
Khed Developers’ appeal against a ₹12 lakh penalty for failing to form an Audit Committee was dismissed. Learn about the case, its implications, and the Regional Director’s ruling.
MCA RD confirmed a ₹12 lakh penalty for Khed Developers Ltd. due to non-constitution of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee as required by the Companies Act.
Siply Services fined for failing to comply with Section 158 of the Companies Act. Penalties applied to the company and its director for non-compliance.
Penalties for Sung Shin Tech India Pvt. Ltd. for non-compliance with Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Details on fines and orders from the Registrar of Companies.
MCA imposes a penalty on T. Forrest & Sons India Pvt Ltd for delaying the issuance of share certificates, violating Section 56(4) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Explore the implications of MCA penalizing TDMAX Manufacturing & Services Pvt Ltd for not regularizing an additional director under Section 161(1) of the Companies Act, 2013.
